Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley appears by her choice to reject a ballot proposal to repeal the state’s 2011 casino legislation. (Image: AP Photo/Elise Amendola)
Opponents of casino gambling in Massachusetts have actually been war that is waging the expansion on every battlefront possible. They’ve had wins and losings across the continuing state, nevertheless they’ve constantly made their case. Now, they’re hoping that the court that is highest in Massachusetts will give them one final chance to put the issue before voters.
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court heard arguments a week ago over the concern of whether a measure to repeal the 2011 casino law can show up on the statewide ballot in November. The move would create a referendum essentially on whether gambling enterprises could be built the one that could disrupt the process even if it had been to ultimately fail.
State Believes Implied Contracts Is Violated By Repeal
That disruption was one associated with main arguments made by lawyers for the state, including Attorney General Martha Coakley, who rejected the petition it was unconstitutional because she felt. According to Coakley, such a repeal would damage the ‘implied agreements’ between casino license applicants and the continuing state gambling payment. She argued that those contract rights would be illegally removed without any settlement for the casino firms.
Coakley made remarks at a Devamını Oku